Performance of Genome Assemblers
Assemblers evaluated in this study
Velvet 1.0.12 | SOAPdenovo 1.04 | SOAPdenovo 1.03 | Euler-sr 1.1.2 | Edena 2.1.1 | SSAKE 3.4 | SSAKE 3.5 | AbySS 1.2.4 |
Benchmarking results
Genome A | Graph 1 | Graph 2 | Graph 3 | Data |
Genome B | Graph 1 | Graph 2 | Graph 3 | Data |
Genome C | Graph 1 | Graph 2 | Graph 3 | Data |
Genome D | Graph 1 | Graph 2 | Graph 3 | Data |
Genome R | Graph 1 | Graph 2 | Graph 3 | Data |
Genome A | 1Graph 1 | Graph 2 | Graph 3 | Data |
Genome B | Graph 1 | Graph 2 | Graph 3 | Data |
Genome C | Graph 1 | Graph 2 | Graph 3 | Data |
Genome D | Graph 1 | Graph 2 | Graph 3 | Data |
Genome R | Graph 1 | Graph 2 | Graph 3 | Data |
Graph 2: Graph between Hash length (K) and Error rate(%) of the total assembly.
Graph 3: Graph between N 50 Contig length and Error rate(%) of the total assembly.